Trending...
- Free Commercial Glass Estimating and Code Compliance Tools Launched by Landmark Construction - The Leading Glass Company in Los Angeles - 154
- 5X Gross Margin Improvement to Beat EPS Consensus; $54.6 Million 10-Year Contract Award Puts Cybersecurity Leader on Path to a $30 Million Run Rate - 150
- New Book, The KI of Marketing, Helps Small Businesses Grow Without Trying to Outspend Bigger Competitors - 108
The ANSI Appeals panel decision illustrates the critical importance of standard development organizations (SDOs) actively ensuring that their consensus bodies are properly balanced between competing materially interested stakeholders.
NEW YORK - Michimich -- ANSI BSR Upholds Appeal of AFDE Member Andrew Sulner, MSFS, JD, finding that the AAFS Academy Standards Board (ASB) Violated ANSI Essential Requirements for Due Process
NEW YORK, N.Y., August 24, 2026 — The Association of Forensic Document Examiners (AFDE) is pleased to announce the recent success of one of its members, Andrew Sulner, MSFS, J.D. (Forensic Document Examinations, LLC) in his appeal of the ANSI BSR's approval of ASB 155 Standard for Minimum Training Requirements for Forensic Document Examiners as an American National Standard (ANS).
Minimum Training Requirements for Forensic Document Examiners were first published in 2005 by ASTM. When the forensic document examination committee of ASTM was disbanded in 2012 that standard transferred to the FBI-funded SWGDOC, which adopted the ASTM training standard verbatim in 2013. Those standards set the duration for training at 4000 hours (two years of full time training) and allowed an equivalent part-time training program of up to four years in duration. This was important because in the private sector, the trainer and trainee are typically already working and can not devote full-time efforts to a training program. In governmental agencies (FBI, IRS, State Crime Labs, etc.), trainers and trainees are paid employees.
More on Michimich.com
What caught Mr. Sulner's attention and caused him great concern with the proposed ASB Standard 155 is that it would have made it substantially impossible for new FDEs to emerge out of the private sector. The ASB 155 standard states, "A trainee may or may not be a salaried employee and is expected to work almost daily with the instructor in their laboratory or office." The concept of equivalent part-time training is not mentioned, and the only allowance to deviate from the defined duration is for "exigent circumstances," and even then, the extension can be no longer than one year. (emphasis added)
The ANSI BSR found for the Appellant, Mr. Sulner, on the issue of dominance, finding that the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) had failed to investigate a written claim of dominance made to it, which it was obligated to do. The ANSI BSR specifically noted that "AAFS's evidentiary submission in support of ASB 155's approval did not establish that [Mr. Sulner's] written claim of dominance was ever investigated or considered, as required" by Sections 1.0, 1.2, and 2.2 of the ANSI Essential Requirements for Due Process.
More on Michimich.com
The Association of Forensic Document Examiners considers the outcome of Mr. Sulner's appeal a successful one for its members, as well as the broader FDE community and the public. We look forward to working on a training standard that is both procedurally and substantively fair to all industry stakeholders.
Mr. Sulner's July 21, 2026 appeal letter, the ASB response, and the August 21, 2026 decision of the ANSI BSR Appeals Panel are available at https://afde.org.
NEW YORK, N.Y., August 24, 2026 — The Association of Forensic Document Examiners (AFDE) is pleased to announce the recent success of one of its members, Andrew Sulner, MSFS, J.D. (Forensic Document Examinations, LLC) in his appeal of the ANSI BSR's approval of ASB 155 Standard for Minimum Training Requirements for Forensic Document Examiners as an American National Standard (ANS).
Minimum Training Requirements for Forensic Document Examiners were first published in 2005 by ASTM. When the forensic document examination committee of ASTM was disbanded in 2012 that standard transferred to the FBI-funded SWGDOC, which adopted the ASTM training standard verbatim in 2013. Those standards set the duration for training at 4000 hours (two years of full time training) and allowed an equivalent part-time training program of up to four years in duration. This was important because in the private sector, the trainer and trainee are typically already working and can not devote full-time efforts to a training program. In governmental agencies (FBI, IRS, State Crime Labs, etc.), trainers and trainees are paid employees.
More on Michimich.com
- Pete Verbica: America Needs Statesmanship and Common Sense — Not a Cult of Personality
- Heidi G. Villari of The Villari Firm, PLLC Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America 2027 for Construction Law and Personal Injury Litigation
- When the Coroner's Report Isn't Enough: Colorado Families Turn to Private Autopsy for Closure
- Nearly One-Third of CRE Asset Managers Make Major Capital Decisions on Gut Instinct, New Survey Finds
- RemoteBridge Names Dr. John N. Just, Ed.D. Chief Executive Officer
What caught Mr. Sulner's attention and caused him great concern with the proposed ASB Standard 155 is that it would have made it substantially impossible for new FDEs to emerge out of the private sector. The ASB 155 standard states, "A trainee may or may not be a salaried employee and is expected to work almost daily with the instructor in their laboratory or office." The concept of equivalent part-time training is not mentioned, and the only allowance to deviate from the defined duration is for "exigent circumstances," and even then, the extension can be no longer than one year. (emphasis added)
The ANSI BSR found for the Appellant, Mr. Sulner, on the issue of dominance, finding that the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) had failed to investigate a written claim of dominance made to it, which it was obligated to do. The ANSI BSR specifically noted that "AAFS's evidentiary submission in support of ASB 155's approval did not establish that [Mr. Sulner's] written claim of dominance was ever investigated or considered, as required" by Sections 1.0, 1.2, and 2.2 of the ANSI Essential Requirements for Due Process.
More on Michimich.com
- Project CIVICA Report Finds 10,680 Non-Citizen Indicators on New York Voter Rolls — Including 88 Records with Recent Voting History
- New Analysis Details Three Converging Forces in AI and Workforce Policy Behind a $37 Billion GDP Reduction
- Revenue Optics Launches Pricing and Revenue Growth Management Practice, Names Shafohi Alamgir Vice President
- Popular AI planner Voiset launches version 2.0 and enters MENA at LEAP 2026 with full Arabic support
- CasaPerks and CredHub Partner to Help the Multifamily Industry Strengthen Resident Activation Through Credit-Building Rewards
The Association of Forensic Document Examiners considers the outcome of Mr. Sulner's appeal a successful one for its members, as well as the broader FDE community and the public. We look forward to working on a training standard that is both procedurally and substantively fair to all industry stakeholders.
Mr. Sulner's July 21, 2026 appeal letter, the ASB response, and the August 21, 2026 decision of the ANSI BSR Appeals Panel are available at https://afde.org.
Source: Association of Forensic Document Examiners
0 Comments
Latest on Michimich.com
- Independent Colbert Packaging Thrives Amid Industrywide Consolidation
- Free Commercial Glass Estimating and Code Compliance Tools Launched by Landmark Construction - The Leading Glass Company in Los Angeles
- Tallahassee Million-Dollar Home Sales Rise in 2026 as Median Selling Time More Than Doubles
- Slotozilla Reports Strong Growth in Q2 2026
- Flexible Plan Investments Names Carl Resnick President
- Paula Josephine Sadler Releases "Imagine" on 24th Anniversary of Sobriety
- Ritz-Carlton Residences Houston Generates Strong Early New Construction Sales at 2120 Post Oak Blvd
- No Sugar Baker Continues National Growth with Seattle Market Expansion Across Washington, Idaho, and Alaska
- Why Most Manager Training Doesn't Work, According to a Michigan Founder
- The Refugee Archive Launches Campaign to Preserve 21 Female-Headed Household Oral Histories in Rebel-Controlled Goma
- The Championship Lives On: Own a Piece of Michigan Basketball History
- Space Ambitions Expanding as New Testing Builds on NASA Results and Targets MEO, GEO and Next-Generation Orbital Markets: Ascent Solar Technologies
- FDA Path Clears, Manufacturing Ramps Up + $22.3 Million Strengthens the Balance Sheet; Inflection Point for NRx Pharmaceuticals (N A S D A Q: NRXP)
- Buy Retatrutide Research Peptide: Why Reta Is Getting So Much Attention
- San Diego Attorney Anthony Z. Vargas Narrows Practice to Employment Law, Representing Employees Only
- PSED Attorney Charles Drabik Named Co-Chair of WCBA Probate & Estate Planning Section
- Pear Sperling Eggan & Daniels, P.C. Attorneys Recognized as 2026 Super Lawyers
- Solid Earth Introduces RealtyID, a Universal Identity Spine for the Real Estate Industry
- BlazeHive's AI SEO Agent Outranks Human Writers on 500+ Google Top-3 Results in 5 Months, on Autopilot
- Phinge Exposes Massive AI Security Risks, Claiming Its Patented Hardware-Verified Architecture Is The Only Safeguard Against Surveillance Capitalism
