Trending...
- Inkdnylon Custom Apparel Launches Cost-Saving System for Promotional Products and Custom Apparel in Chicago - 129
- Larry R. Wasion Highlights Jump Gate I: Time Chair. The Opening Novel in His Expansive Science Fiction Series
- U.S. Government Contracts in Excess of 38 Million Secured Through Partner, Establishing Multi-Year Defense Revenue Platform Through 2032: $BLIS
DETROIT--(BUSINESS WIRE)--An updated class-action lawsuit filed by owners of Ford Super Duty pickup trucks depicts what attorneys at Hagens Berman say is the result of Ford having "repeatedly chosen to degrade the structural capacity and therefore safety of its trucks" for decades. The lawsuit shows photos of crushed roofs following rollover accidents, affecting 5.2 million pickups.
The amended class-action complaint filed Sept. 27, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan illustrates a timeline of repeatedly downgraded steel components and removal of key structures in Ford's Super Duty pickup trucks. So far, Ford has identified 162 lawsuits and 83 similar incidents of the roof crush involving the 1999-2016 Super Duty trucks.
The dangerously weak roof design can lead to collapse and grave injuries during rollover accidents, according to attorneys, and Ford's own cost-saving measures have led to the danger of the affected Super Duty trucks. If you own or lease a 1999 – 2016 Ford Super Duty pickup truck, contact Hagens Berman to find out more about this issue and your consumer rights against Ford.
More on Michimich.com
A Long History of Safety Slights
"When the public looks at Ford's history of subtle, yet impactful and plentiful design choices over the decades it has made these trucks, a single storyline is clear: Ford has repeatedly chosen to degrade the structural capacity and therefore safety of its trucks, again and again, for sake of cost savings," said Steve Berman, Hagens Berman co-founder and managing partner. "A read of Ford's choices is a redundant tale of deletions and downgage of steel, reducing the thickness of essential components of the truck cab."
The complaint outlines Ford's deletion of a windshield outer, deletion of the front header outer, downgage of the steel in the windshield header inner as well as the roof bows, rear door vertical beams and the A-Pillar. Additionally, Ford downgraded the steel in another structural pillar from Boron steel (which is multiple times stronger than normal steel) to mild steel. The lawsuit states that Ford has no test results to show what affect the downgages and changes in roof and door structure had on roof crush strength.
"Ford did not even attempt to ascertain how much weaker its hunger for profits made the roof structures of the Roof-Crush Risk Vehicles," the suit states. "Ford's rejection of its own tests and efforts to increase profits, as outlined above by purposefully degrading the strength of the roof both pre- and post-production of the first Roof-Crush Risk Vehicles, squarely evidences Ford's knowledge that the Roof-Crush Risk Vehicles had an unsafe and dangerous design from before the sale of the first 1999 model year SuperDuty."
To worsen the retelling of Ford's choices, as third-party tests were conducted on the cab roof crush strength of its pickups for purposes of litigation, the results showed that the roof crushed at a weight 800 pounds lower than Ford indicated it would in its own published results, according to the complaint.
In August 2022, a Georgia jury awarded $1.7 billion in punitive damages to the family of Melvin and Voncile Hill, who were killed when the roof of their 2002 F-250 SuperDuty collapsed in a rollover accident. Attorneys for the family showed the roof on these trucks failed in the company's own internal testing and that Ford engineers developed a stronger roof for its Super Duty pickups in 2004 but that roof wasn't used in trucks sold to customers until the 2017 model year, according to court documents.
More on Michimich.com
"Ford has clearly failed its customers and has failed the public in living up to the basic level of responsibility that a company must adhere to when selling products to the public," Berman said.
The lawsuit seeks repayment to affected owners and lessees for damages, including loss of vehicle value and out-of-pocket costs. The lawsuit accuses Ford of fraudulent concealment, warranty violations, unjust enrichment and breaking consumer-rights laws.
Learn more about the class-action lawsuit against Ford for the roof crush risk affecting its Super Duty pickup trucks.
About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm's determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of "Most Feared Plaintiff's Firm," MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.
Contacts
Ashley Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-268-9363
The amended class-action complaint filed Sept. 27, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan illustrates a timeline of repeatedly downgraded steel components and removal of key structures in Ford's Super Duty pickup trucks. So far, Ford has identified 162 lawsuits and 83 similar incidents of the roof crush involving the 1999-2016 Super Duty trucks.
The dangerously weak roof design can lead to collapse and grave injuries during rollover accidents, according to attorneys, and Ford's own cost-saving measures have led to the danger of the affected Super Duty trucks. If you own or lease a 1999 – 2016 Ford Super Duty pickup truck, contact Hagens Berman to find out more about this issue and your consumer rights against Ford.
More on Michimich.com
- Larry R. Wasion Highlights Jump Gate I: Time Chair. The Opening Novel in His Expansive Science Fiction Series
- New Book Reveals The Science Of Predictions
- Compliance Alert: Maryland, Texas Regulate Use of Artificial Intelligence in Utilization Reviews
- Reozom Expands Flat Fee MLS Services in Florida and Michigan with Digital Listing Platform
- Colony Ridge Communities Celebrates Successful Soccer Season Kickoff with Families and Youth
A Long History of Safety Slights
"When the public looks at Ford's history of subtle, yet impactful and plentiful design choices over the decades it has made these trucks, a single storyline is clear: Ford has repeatedly chosen to degrade the structural capacity and therefore safety of its trucks, again and again, for sake of cost savings," said Steve Berman, Hagens Berman co-founder and managing partner. "A read of Ford's choices is a redundant tale of deletions and downgage of steel, reducing the thickness of essential components of the truck cab."
The complaint outlines Ford's deletion of a windshield outer, deletion of the front header outer, downgage of the steel in the windshield header inner as well as the roof bows, rear door vertical beams and the A-Pillar. Additionally, Ford downgraded the steel in another structural pillar from Boron steel (which is multiple times stronger than normal steel) to mild steel. The lawsuit states that Ford has no test results to show what affect the downgages and changes in roof and door structure had on roof crush strength.
"Ford did not even attempt to ascertain how much weaker its hunger for profits made the roof structures of the Roof-Crush Risk Vehicles," the suit states. "Ford's rejection of its own tests and efforts to increase profits, as outlined above by purposefully degrading the strength of the roof both pre- and post-production of the first Roof-Crush Risk Vehicles, squarely evidences Ford's knowledge that the Roof-Crush Risk Vehicles had an unsafe and dangerous design from before the sale of the first 1999 model year SuperDuty."
To worsen the retelling of Ford's choices, as third-party tests were conducted on the cab roof crush strength of its pickups for purposes of litigation, the results showed that the roof crushed at a weight 800 pounds lower than Ford indicated it would in its own published results, according to the complaint.
In August 2022, a Georgia jury awarded $1.7 billion in punitive damages to the family of Melvin and Voncile Hill, who were killed when the roof of their 2002 F-250 SuperDuty collapsed in a rollover accident. Attorneys for the family showed the roof on these trucks failed in the company's own internal testing and that Ford engineers developed a stronger roof for its Super Duty pickups in 2004 but that roof wasn't used in trucks sold to customers until the 2017 model year, according to court documents.
More on Michimich.com
- NYC Composer/Educator Launches Debut Children's Book to Fantastic Reviews
- EFA Announces 2026 Editorial Rate Chart
- Red5 Taps PubNub to Power the Next Era of Real-Time Interactive Streaming
- Shoutout Joseph Neibich aka Nybyk
- Meet Joseph Neibich aka Joseph Nybyk of Beachwood Canyon
"Ford has clearly failed its customers and has failed the public in living up to the basic level of responsibility that a company must adhere to when selling products to the public," Berman said.
The lawsuit seeks repayment to affected owners and lessees for damages, including loss of vehicle value and out-of-pocket costs. The lawsuit accuses Ford of fraudulent concealment, warranty violations, unjust enrichment and breaking consumer-rights laws.
Learn more about the class-action lawsuit against Ford for the roof crush risk affecting its Super Duty pickup trucks.
About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm's determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of "Most Feared Plaintiff's Firm," MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.
Contacts
Ashley Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-268-9363
Filed Under: Business
0 Comments
Latest on Michimich.com
- Michigan Faces Challenges From Climate Change: Flooding, Foundation Leaks, And Aging Sewers
- The World's First Fully Regenerative Economy: Securing Energy, Food, and a Clean Planet
- The State of Law Firm Marketing: Top Companies, Awards, and Resources
- Michigan SEO Group Announces New Internet Marketing Specialist
- USA Best Book Awards Finalist What Love Leaves Behind Releases March 24
- Inkdnylon Custom Apparel Launches Cost-Saving System for Promotional Products and Custom Apparel in Chicago
- ENTOUCH Named Finalist for 2026 North American Inspiring Workplaces Awards
- Wilderness Construction Helps Ann Arbor Homeowners Navigate the Paint vs. Replace Cabinet Decision
- Cleveland County Goat Farm NC Kikos Featured in "Feature Farmer Friday" Documentary
- Tony Grundler Introduces Artificial Intelligence V.S. Avatar-Ian's
- Sterling Heights City Council Opposes HB 5529-5532; Supports Locally Driven Housing Solutions
- Sterling Heights: Soak Up Spring this April with #MYSHPR
- Sterling Heights: Library Launches New Authors and Artists Sale Series at Dodge Park Thursdays
- Hollywood's Elite Gather at the Annual WOW Creations Oscars Gifting Suite at the Universal Hilton
- Where Were the Women? Reframing the Greek Revolution Through Contemporary Art
- Calmly Rooted Announces Strategic Evolution of "The Calm Collective" Wellness Hub
- JGCMGS Details Architecture to Safeguard Assets From Unauthorized Phishing Scams
- 21 Days: The Malta Deadline That Could Redraw the Finnish Online Casino Map
- JEGS Launches Modern, Secure Payments Powered by PhaseZero.ai
- U.S. Government Contracts in Excess of 38 Million Secured Through Partner, Establishing Multi-Year Defense Revenue Platform Through 2032: $BLIS