Trending...
- Entering 2026 with Expanding Footprint, Strong Industry Tailwinds, and Anticipated Q3 Results: Off The Hook YS Inc. (N Y S E American: OTH)
- Crunchbase Ranks Phinge Founder & CEO Robert DeMaio #1 Globally. Meet him in Las Vegas-Week of CES to Learn About Netverse, Patented App-less Platform
- Super League (N A S D A Q: SLE) Enters Breakout Phase: New Partnerships, Zero Debt & $20 Million Growth Capital Position Company for 2026 Acceleration
Agency: Attorney General
Media contact: Lynsey Mukomel 517-599-2746
Public inquiries: 517-335-7622
October 22, 2021
LANSING - Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel joined a coalition of 24 attorneys general in urging the United States Supreme Court to stop Texas' unconstitutional six-week abortion ban, Senate Bill 8 (S.B. 8), by vacating the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' stay of a District Court order blocking the ban from going into effect.
The amicus brief, filed with the Supreme Court in the case of United States of America v. State of Texas et al., supports a challenge by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and calls on the Court not to allow Texas to openly disregard nearly a half century of precedent by keeping this unconstitutional, across-the-board ban in place within its borders.
"My sentiments on this issue have never changed, nor has my commitment to protecting a woman's right to make decisions that affect her own body," Nessel said. "We cannot stand idly by as legislators show blatant disregard for federal precedent surrounding reproductive rights - a precedent set by the very Court that is now being asked to ignore its own ruling. Outlawing abortion will not prevent abortions - it only prevents access to safe abortions. We, as elected officials, have a responsibility to recognize the harm this law inflicts. I will continue to fight back against these efforts alongside my colleagues, and remain committed to protecting a woman's right to choose."
More on Michimich.com
According to the brief, S.B. 8 not only imposes a ban on almost all abortions in Texas in open disregard of the Supreme Court's precedent, but also attempts to thwart judicial review and insulate Texas from accountability by purporting to create only a private enforcement scheme. Texas created a structure within its state court system that requires courts to award at least $10,000 as well as injunctive relief to claimants who bring cases against providers and those who "aid or abet" such constitutionally protected care. As such, the law threatens potential liability for anyone who so much as gives a patient a ride to an abortion provider.
In accordance with the ban, providers in Texas have largely stopped providing abortion care to their patients. This has affected not only patients in Texas, but clinics and patients in states like California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Nevada, and Oklahoma. In New Mexico, in particular, an influx of patients from Texas has already strained provider resources and made it more difficult for New Mexico residents to receive timely care.
"Most patients now must travel out of state, which makes abortion for many people too difficult, too time-intensive, and too costly," the brief states. "Consequently, many will now be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, resulting in negative health and socioeconomic consequences for both them and their children. And the harms caused by S.B. 8 are rippling well beyond Texas into other states, as people are forced to seek care elsewhere, in many places overwhelming capacity and threatening our own residents' access to care."
More on Michimich.com
The brief urges the Supreme Court to stop S.B. 8 from inflicting further irreparable harm. It cites back to past examples from our Nation's history, particularly related to some states' resistance to desegregation, in arguing that the Court should not permit states to violate constitutional rights through state laws ostensibly enforced only by private parties. The Court "should not permit Texas to 'nullif[y] indirectly' the constitutional rights recognized in Roe and Casey through the 'evasive scheme' that it has created in S.B. 8," the brief argues.
Joining AG Nessel in the brief, led by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, are the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.
A copy of the brief is online.
Media contact: Lynsey Mukomel 517-599-2746
Public inquiries: 517-335-7622
October 22, 2021
LANSING - Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel joined a coalition of 24 attorneys general in urging the United States Supreme Court to stop Texas' unconstitutional six-week abortion ban, Senate Bill 8 (S.B. 8), by vacating the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' stay of a District Court order blocking the ban from going into effect.
The amicus brief, filed with the Supreme Court in the case of United States of America v. State of Texas et al., supports a challenge by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and calls on the Court not to allow Texas to openly disregard nearly a half century of precedent by keeping this unconstitutional, across-the-board ban in place within its borders.
"My sentiments on this issue have never changed, nor has my commitment to protecting a woman's right to make decisions that affect her own body," Nessel said. "We cannot stand idly by as legislators show blatant disregard for federal precedent surrounding reproductive rights - a precedent set by the very Court that is now being asked to ignore its own ruling. Outlawing abortion will not prevent abortions - it only prevents access to safe abortions. We, as elected officials, have a responsibility to recognize the harm this law inflicts. I will continue to fight back against these efforts alongside my colleagues, and remain committed to protecting a woman's right to choose."
More on Michimich.com
- CCHR Documentary Probes Growing Evidence Linking Psychiatric Drugs to Violence
- Tokenized Real-World Assets: Iguabit Brings Institutional Investment Opportunities to Brazil
- MEX Finance meluncurkan platform keuangan berbasis riset yang berfokus pada data, logika, dan efisiensi pengambilan keputusan investasi
- From MelaMed Wellness to Calmly Rooted: A New Chapter in Functional Wellness
- New Angles US Group Founder Alexander Harrington Receives Top U.S. Corporate Training Honor and Leads Asia-Pacific Engagements in Taiwan
According to the brief, S.B. 8 not only imposes a ban on almost all abortions in Texas in open disregard of the Supreme Court's precedent, but also attempts to thwart judicial review and insulate Texas from accountability by purporting to create only a private enforcement scheme. Texas created a structure within its state court system that requires courts to award at least $10,000 as well as injunctive relief to claimants who bring cases against providers and those who "aid or abet" such constitutionally protected care. As such, the law threatens potential liability for anyone who so much as gives a patient a ride to an abortion provider.
In accordance with the ban, providers in Texas have largely stopped providing abortion care to their patients. This has affected not only patients in Texas, but clinics and patients in states like California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Nevada, and Oklahoma. In New Mexico, in particular, an influx of patients from Texas has already strained provider resources and made it more difficult for New Mexico residents to receive timely care.
"Most patients now must travel out of state, which makes abortion for many people too difficult, too time-intensive, and too costly," the brief states. "Consequently, many will now be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, resulting in negative health and socioeconomic consequences for both them and their children. And the harms caused by S.B. 8 are rippling well beyond Texas into other states, as people are forced to seek care elsewhere, in many places overwhelming capacity and threatening our own residents' access to care."
More on Michimich.com
- UK Financial Ltd Board of Directors Establishes Official News Distribution Framework and Issues Governance Decision on Official Telegram Channels
- UK Financial Ltd Sets Official 30-Day Conversion Deadline for Three Exchange Listed Tokens Ahead of Regulated Upgrade
- New Jersey Therapy and Life Coaching Unveils Original Dan Fenelon Mural in Voorhees New Jersey Therapy Office
- New Satirical Expose, Classified Report: Prime Evil, Launches on Amazon, Somehow Approved by Amazon
- Kentucky Judges Ignore Evidence, Prolong Father's Ordeal in Baseless Case
The brief urges the Supreme Court to stop S.B. 8 from inflicting further irreparable harm. It cites back to past examples from our Nation's history, particularly related to some states' resistance to desegregation, in arguing that the Court should not permit states to violate constitutional rights through state laws ostensibly enforced only by private parties. The Court "should not permit Texas to 'nullif[y] indirectly' the constitutional rights recognized in Roe and Casey through the 'evasive scheme' that it has created in S.B. 8," the brief argues.
Joining AG Nessel in the brief, led by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, are the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.
A copy of the brief is online.
0 Comments
Latest on Michimich.com
- CCHR Florida Joins Global Call to Ban Electroshock Treatment, Citing New Evidence of Widespread Patient Harm
- BoxingRx Announces Full Gym Renovation Ahead of New Ownership's One-Year Anniversary
- UK Financial Ltd Announces It's Official Corporate Headquarters In The United Kingdom
- Rigani Press Announces Breakthrough Book for Health IT and Medical Leaders to Forge the Road to Responsible AI
- FreeTo.Chat - The bold, Anonymous Confession Platform, ushers in a new era of tension relief
- Female Founders Institute Announces Special Performance by Caitlin McGrath at the 2026 Charity Gala
- Hyatt House Fresno Celebrates Grand Opening, Introducing the First Hyatt House in Fresno, California
- "I Make Music Not Excuses" Journal by Anthony Clint Jr. Becomes International Amazon Best Seller, Empowering Music Creators Worldwide
- Novi Glass Company Says Why Custom Mirrors are Better
- Michigan Debt Collection Agency Helps Creditors Start the New Year Fresh!
- Ann Arbor Chiropractor Uses ESWT to Treat Elbow Pain
- Ann Arbor Computer Service Shares the Spirit of Giving!
- DanReDev, Kaufman Development & Oldivai Announce Major 2026 Projects Nationwide
- Accelerating Precious Metals Expansion and Digital Asset Innovation Ahead of 2026: Asia Broadband Inc. (Stock Symbol: AABB)
- Naturism Resurgence (NRE) Announces the World's First Standardised Stigma Measure (SSM) for Naturism
- London Art Exchange Emerges as a Leading Force in UK Contemporary Art, Elevating Three Artists to Secondary-Market Success
- myLAB Box Expands, Becoming the First and Only At-Home Testing Company to Serve the Entire Family—Human and Furry—with New Pet Intolerance Test
- Winning the C-Suite: How to Build the Executive Case for Sustained PLM Investment
- Entering 2026 with Expanding Footprint, Strong Industry Tailwinds, and Anticipated Q3 Results: Off The Hook YS Inc. (N Y S E American: OTH)
- Tiger-Rock Martial Arts Appoints Jami Bond as Vice President of Growth