Trending...
- Scarecrow Fest offers fall-themed activities at Frankenmuth River Place Shops - 208
- CCHR: For Prevention, Families Deserve Truth From NIH Study on Psychiatric Drugs - 207
- DivX Unveils New Educational Blog Series to Simplify MKV to MP4 Video Conversion - 204
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Michimich -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Michimich.com
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Michimich.com
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Michimich.com
- New Analysis Reveals the Complex Forces Driving the 'Great Human Reshuffle'
- Elevate Unveils GroundComm X30 at 2025 International GSE Expo in Las Vegas
- NEW power supply release from Kepco Dynatronix - HSP Advanced
- St. Augustine Honors Hispanic Heritage Month
- Vesica Health Receives AUA Guideline Inclusion
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Michimich.com
- Steward's Plumbing Sponsors the 2025 Samson Challenge, Bringing Community, Fitness, and Fun Together in Albuquerque
- Spelman College wins 7th annual Moguls in the Making entrepreneurial pitch competition
- Price Right RV Announces Participation in the 36th Annual Fall Detroit RV & Camping Show
- 10xLaw.com Extends Employment Opportunity to Kim Kardashian
- DecisionPoint Technologies Accelerates Growth with Acquisition of Acuity Technologies
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
Filed Under: Legal
0 Comments
Latest on Michimich.com
- Green Office Partner Named #1 Best Place to Work in Chicago by Crain's for 2025
- Roofman USA Expands Roofing Services Across Michigan, Adding Key Locations
- Roofman USA Highlights the Importance of Hiring Specialized Residential Roofers in Ann Arbor
- Wilderness Construction Offers Expert Guidance on Siding Color Selection for Ann Arbor Homeowners
- Japanese Martial Arts Center Promotes Karate as Stress Relief for Ann Arbor Adults
- CCHR, a Mental Health Watchdog Organization, Hosts Weekly Events Educating Citizens on Important Mental Health Issues
- "Leading From Day One: The Essential Guide for New Supervisors" Draws from 25+ Years of International Management Experience
- New Slotozilla Project Explores What Happens When the World Goes Silent
- Calder Capital Bolsters Leadership, Doubles Down on Long-Term Growth Plans
- The Two Faces of Charles D. Braun: How the Novel, Posthumously Yours, Came to Life
- Macomb Township Chiropractic Chiropractor Improves Posture Problems and Pain
- Don't Let Hip Pain Slow You Down! Macomb Township Chiropractic Can Help!
- AI in Physics-Based Product Performance Simulation: From Surrogates to Solvers
- Wise Business Plans Launches Comprehensive Business Plan Services Across Michigan's Major Cities
- Counseling Center of New Smyrna Beach Expands Affordable Mental Health Services for Volusia County
- Athena Forge (ATFG) Introduces Advanced Token for Technology-Driven Financial Ecosystem
- Albuquerque's Z-CoiL Footwear Brings All-American Family Business Story to Shark Tank Season Premiere
- NoviSign Sponsoring VARTECH 2025 - the B2B IT channel's #1 event
- Unicorp and BH Group Select Chasing Creative—Palm Coast Agency—to Lead Growth Marketing for The Ritz-Carlton Residences, Hammock Dunes
- Breaking: 50+ runners from 20+ states relay custom 9/11 flag 485 miles from Shanksville through DC to Ground Zero for memorial remembrance run