Trending...
- Hiclean Tools Releases HCX2100 Electric Pressure Washer
- Some Music for Donald's Bad Day
- New Article Reveals Common Pricing Pitfalls in Flooring Projects — And How to Avoid Them
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Michimich -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Michimich.com
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Michimich.com
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Michimich.com
- Matthew Cossolotto, Author of The Joy of Public Speaking, Appears on "Get Authentic with Marques Ogden" and "Achieving Success with Olivia Atkin"
- CCHR Exposes Conflicted Psychiatrists Behind Teen Antidepressant Surge
- WIBO Announces Fall 2025 Entrepreneurship Programs to Empower NYC Founders and Small Business Owners
- Local College Student Launches "Cleopatra" App to Make Cleaning Easy for Mercer County Residents
- Wohler announces release of additional Balance Control output tracking for its eSeries in-rack monitor range
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Michimich.com
- Bavarian Blast Waterpark Announces Season Passes
- A Milestone of Giving: Ten Percent Group Donates £25,000 to Cure Parkinson's
- Tami Goveia Enters FabOver40, Inspiring Hollywood Legacy for Breast Cancer Cause
- Sterling Heights: Looking Local: Five Must-Try Favorites at Choco Mania Cafe
- Looking Local: Hug Baan Thai Creates a Cozy Escape in Sterling Heights
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
Filed Under: Legal
0 Comments
Latest on Michimich.com
- America Anesthesia Partners Unveils New User-Friendly Website
- Hiclean Tools Releases HCX2100 Electric Pressure Washer
- Bùng Nổ Ra Mắt, AALIVE Tung Gói Thưởng 68% và Dàn Game Thuần Việt Hấp Dẫn
- ARCH Dental + Aesthetics Offers Free Consultations for New Patients
- Maisano Brothers Inc. Expands National Paving Division Into Tampa, Florida
- Multi-Signature Cold Storage: Keyanb Introduces Institutional-Grade Asset Protection for Chilean Crypto Traders
- NKSCX Introduces Zero-Knowledge Proof of Solvency for U.S. Traders Amid $6.5 Billion Fraud Crisis
- New Oasis International Foundation Announces Strategic Partnership Network Across 15 Countries to Advance Community-Led Economic Development
- Some Music for Donald's Bad Day
- New You Smile Dental Implant Center Expands Office
- $8 Billion High-Margin National Gentlemen's Club Market Targeted by Acquisition Strategy Incorporating the Successful Peppermint Hippo™ Brand: $TRWD
- Why Indian Game Development Companies Are Shaping the Future of Global Gaming
- Cold Storage and Proof-of-Reserves: BTXSGG Launches Institutional-Grade Asset Protection for Filipino Traders
- CGT Highlights Strategic Advantages of Nitrogen Generators for Large-Scale Food Manufacturers
- Why FIRE Enthusiasts Are Buying Businesses Instead of Just Saving Their Way to Freedom
- All About bail Bonds Expands Presence to Serve Houston Families
- Thousands to Ride to L.A. Children's Hospital This Halloween Night
- Essential Living Support Opens First VA Medical Foster Home in Cheyenne, Wyoming
- Six-Figure Chicks Book Series 96 Authors, 6 Volumes Published to Empower and Mentor Women Nationwide
- LSC Destruction Launches Cutting-Edge Cryptocurrency Scanning to Hard Drive Destruction Services